Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Police Facility topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Garden City delays decision on temporary police facility, asks staff for itemized costs and parcel options
Summary
After weeks of review, commissioners heard two competing proposals for an interim Garden City Police Department facility—a new build from Premier Homes and a remodel of a downtown historic building—and voted to postpone any decision until Dec. 3 while staff prepares an itemized cost comparison and identifies potential city parcels for construction.
Get email alerts on the Police Facility topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Garden City Commission on Nov. 19 deferred a decision about a temporary location for the Garden City Police Department, directing staff to return to the commission at its Dec. 3 meeting with an itemized cost comparison of the two proposals and an inventory of any city‑owned parcels that might be used for new construction.
Chief Pruitt told the commission the request-for-proposals (RFP) process produced two responsive offers: Premier Homes proposed a purpose-built 13,392‑square‑foot facility at 2052 E. Labrador Blvd that Premier represents could be ready within nine months of permitting; Wharton's Limited LLC proposed remodeling a roughly 20,000‑square‑foot historic downtown building at 601 N. Main Street. The commission committee that reviewed the proposals discussed lease and purchase options and expressed a preference toward purchase given uncertainty about how long the department will be displaced from the Law Enforcement Center (LEC).
During nearly three hours of discussion, commissioners repeatedly raised three core concerns: how “temporary” the interim site would actually be (commissioners estimated it could be used for years, possibly a decade, depending on how long county planning and funding for a new jail/LEC refurbishment takes); whether proposals included adequate parking and security features; and how the city would pay for purchase versus lease options. Premier Homes’ representative said their price was based on local bids and that the firm designed the building specifically for police operations, limiting optional, high‑end features to keep cost down. Wharton's representatives advised that the downtown remodel’s larger footprint offers additional space but would require historic‑preservation approvals and carries typical risks of renovating an older building.
Several commissioners urged caution about committing large taxpayer funds without clearer financing plans. Staff said options for funding could include savings from ending payments to the county, reserves, or debt financing; staff also said negotiations with the county about short extensions to the existing LEC agreement appear possible if extra time is needed to complete procurement.
Commissioner (speaker 16) moved, and the commission seconded and approved, a motion to postpone the purchase/lease decision until the commission’s first meeting in December and to direct staff to provide a more detailed, itemized cost breakdown for both proposals and identify city parcels that could be viable for new construction. The motion passed by voice vote.
What’s next: Staff will prepare the itemized comparison and parcel list and present the information at the commission meeting scheduled for Dec. 3, 2024. The commission’s decision then will guide whether staff drafts agreements for purchase or lease or returns with a revised RFP.
Quotes
“Protecting my people is first and foremost,” Chief Pruitt said in explaining priorities for any interim site. “The second is making sure our service to the public doesn’t change no matter where we’re at.”
Premier Homes’ representative said the firm “designed it to be affordable” and offered to provide additional itemization if the commission requested it.
Clarifying details
- Two proposals received in response to the RFP: Premier Homes (new construction, 13,392 sq ft, ~9 months to build) and Wharton's Limited LLC (remodel, ~20,000 sq ft; historic building requires State Historic Preservation Office review). - Price examples discussed: Premier Homes purchase figure quoted in materials ranged in the $3.3M–$3.6M area depending on options; Premier representative said $3,602,800 would reflect selecting options 1–11. - Dispatch/911 center is explicitly excluded from this RFP and will be handled as a separate project.
Speakers and attributions in this article are drawn from the public meeting transcript and the list of speakers provided to the commission. The commission did not take a binding purchase or lease action on Nov. 19.

