Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Curb Sidewalk Amendment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Clearlake planning commission raises curb, sidewalk trigger to $50,000 and adopts zoning text amendment
Summary
The Clearlake Planning Commission on Oct. 22 adopted zoning text amendments (ZA2024-02) that raise the dollar threshold triggering required curb, gutter and sidewalk installation from $10,000 to $50,000, clarify exemptions and preserve an in‑lieu option used for Lakeshore Drive improvements.
The Clearlake Planning Commission on Oct. 22 unanimously adopted zoning text amendments (ZA2024-02) that raise the improvement threshold that triggers required curb, gutter and sidewalk installation from $10,000 to $50,000.
City planning staff told commissioners the old $10,000 threshold dated to the 1980s and unintentionally captured routine repairs; staff said they compared neighboring jurisdictions and adjusted for local housing values to arrive at the $50,000 figure as a compromise. Staff also explained the rule applies when a property owner seeks building permits for improvements exceeding the threshold or when discretionary entitlements (for example, use permits, subdivisions or rezones) are required.
The ordinance retains exemptions for routine maintenance, federally or state‑mandated flood‑elevation work (NFIP/BFE compliance) and projects where the root protection zone or topography makes sidewalks impractical. Staff described three waiver options: (1) a city‑approved in‑lieu fee (the city engineer had set $90 per linear foot for Lakeshore Drive projects), (2) a deferral agreement with security and timelines approved by the city attorney, or (3) a site‑specific finding by the city manager for unusual lot size or topography. Planning staff said the $90 in‑lieu figure for Lakeshore Drive is tied to the planned streetscape project and may be updated over time.
A business owner who identified themself as a Lakeshore Drive proprietor urged the commission to consider the financial burden on small businesses and called the requirement an “extortion fee.” Planning staff responded that the figure was an engineering estimate specific to the Lakeshore Drive streetscape and that construction costs have risen since it was first calculated. A resident, Stephanie, asked whether a change of ownership automatically triggers the improvement requirement; staff clarified that buying property alone does not trigger the requirement — only qualifying improvements or discretionary permits do.
After discussion the commission moved, seconded and approved the amendment on a unanimous roll‑call vote. The commission closed public comment on the item before taking the vote. The adopted changes update the municipal code to reflect current construction costs and to narrow unintended triggers for curb and sidewalk installation.
