Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Public Works topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Residents raise alarm over PG&E tree removals in Lincoln Crossing Nature Preserve; city to request PG&E briefing

City of Lincoln City Council · January 24, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Residents told the council that multiple trees were cut in the Lincoln Crossing Nature Preserve; staff said PG&E conducts mandated vegetation work under CPUC rules and requested PG&E appear at a future meeting to explain arborist and compliance practices and whether work can be paused in sensitive areas.

Multiple residents told the Lincoln City Council that utility crews have removed trees in the Lincoln Crossing Nature Preserve and asked for city oversight and replanting plans.

A resident identified as Paul (public comment) circulated photos and said a roughly 20‑foot tree beneath 40‑foot wires had been cut and that other nearby trees were removed despite appearing well clear of lines. Another resident (Marsha Schnapp) said she had title documents indicating the preserve has federal protections and that PG&E staff appeared unaware; she asked the city to be looped in while she awaits PG&E follow‑up.

City staff replied that PG&E's vegetation maintenance is driven by California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) requirements and that the city has limited authority to stop mandated safety work. The city manager (S10) said he had asked PG&E for details about their arborist presence, clearance standards and decision process and would invite PG&E to present at a future meeting. He also said he would ask whether PG&E could pause work in specified sensitive areas while the city and community review concerns.

Council members noted the potential for easements and subsurface utilities (including a gas line easement) to affect tree clearance decisions and asked staff to verify facts before drawing conclusions. The council did not take regulatory action at the meeting; staff committed to follow up with PG&E and to schedule a presentation explaining their process to the council and public.