Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Local Governance Hunting topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Local meeting focuses on hunting ordinances; speakers warn rescinding local rules can revert authority to state law

Unidentified Governing Body · August 26, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Speakers at a local governing meeting cautioned that rescinding county ordinances on hunting can allow state hunting law to govern, and offered to provide model ordinances and enforcement assistance; the body set its next regular meeting and adjourned.

Unidentified Speaker 2 warned that rescinding local hunting rules can produce unintended results, saying, "Some counties have made the mistake of rescinding their ordinance, and they didn't realize that when they rescinded that ordinance, repealed it, that it basically reverted to state law." The remark framed the meeting's substantive discussion about whether and how local rules should be adopted or retained ahead of a May 1, 2025 deadline.

The concern, as Speaker 2 described it, is that without a local ordinance specifying conditions such as minimum distances or written permissions, "it reverted back to state law" under which hunting during the general firearms season is lawful provided hunters meet state requirements such as caliber and season. Speaker 2 urged clarity so the public "doesn't trip somebody up who may be unknowingly breaking the law." A different participant, Unidentified Speaker 3, asked whether staff could work with the office to draft an ordinance the body could enforce; Speaker 2 affirmed that offer and said model ordinances and a printed digest could be provided for public reference.

Speakers also discussed the quality of supporting data. Speaker 2 said metrics presented to the body lacked sufficient breakdowns, noting age groups "wasn't specified" and asking for video and more detailed data so decisions and training can be better targeted. "I'm a data hound," Speaker 2 said, requesting access to all available data to inform a careful decision.

On routine business, the presiding speaker reviewed the agenda as complete and announced the next regular meeting will be the second Monday after Labor Day. The body took a motion to adjourn, which was moved and seconded, and the presiding speaker called a voice vote; the meeting was adjourned.

No formal ordinance was adopted during this session; speakers offered next steps that included model language, coordination on enforceable local rules, and follow-up data and video to clarify metrics and age-group breakdowns for any future decision.