Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Event Rental And Funding topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Fair committee approves fairgrounds booking for National Night Out and discusses eliminating gate fees

Richland County Fair Committee · October 23, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Richland County Fair Committee approved reserving the fairgrounds and waiving rental fees for National Night Out and discussed converting county support from a loan to an annual disbursement to eliminate general gate prices; members raised fiscal and tax-reporting questions.

The Richland County Fair Committee voted to reserve the fairgrounds and waive standard rental fees for National Night Out after a committee member described the event's community outreach role and charitable fundraising for law enforcement units. The committee approved the motion after it was moved and seconded.

Committee member (identified in the record as Speaker 2) told the group the event, held for several years, is designed to let the public interact with police and emergency services and that proceeds generally support the sheriff's department and the city police canine unit. Speaker 2 asked to reserve the grounds on "August 5" (the transcript reads "August 5 of 25" but the year was not specified in the meeting record) and requested that the rental fee be waived because the fundraiser benefits public safety programs.

The chair proposed a motion to reserve the fairgrounds for National Night Out and to waive the committee's normal fee policy. The motion was recorded as "Motion by Cindy Campbell" and was seconded; the chair called for the ayes and declared the motion carried.

The committee then discussed gate prices more broadly. Speaker 4 said staff and committee members had been asked to study the county's existing arrangement in which the fair repays county funds advanced from the tax levy. Speaker 4 described a plan under discussion to treat that county support as an annual disbursement (described in the meeting as a donation rather than a loan), which could allow the committee to eliminate general gate fees while keeping charges for grandstand events. Speaker 5 and other members asked whether the proposed change would provide sufficient revenue to sustain fair operations; Jeff (named in the record) described earlier discussions as "pretty positive," but no final fiscal decision was reached.

Members also raised procedural and tax-reporting questions. Committee members noted vendor reporting obligations and referenced a tax form in the discussion; the transcript includes an exchange about vendors needing to complete a form if they sell merchandise (one speaker referenced a "per 2 40 form"), and the group said they would investigate the correct vendor reporting process before any policy change.

What happens next: The committee agreed to continue exploring the funding model and to move any formal proposal through the appropriate executive committee and committee process before making changes to gate pricing or county funding arrangements.