Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Tourism Grants topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Summit County council approves nearly $3.9M in restaurant‑tax grants after competitive scoring

Summit County Council · May 24, 2023
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Summit County Council approved the Restaurant Tax Advisory Committee’s 2023 grant recommendations, allocating about $3.9 million across 49 awards from roughly $5.6 million in requests; committee chair Billy DeMong described a new percentage‑allocation method and emphasis on sustainability and geographic diversification.

The Summit County Council on May 24 approved the Restaurant Tax Advisory Committee’s 2023 grant recommendations, directing roughly $3.9 million to 49 projects after the committee scored about $5.6 million in requests.

Billy DeMong, the committee chair, told the council the group used a multi‑step scoring process guided by state statute and county code and incorporated a sustainable‑tourism metric added by the council last year. “We ran, I think, a very good process… the application was then made available on the county website on March 1,” DeMong said.

DeMong said the panel assigned liaisons to applicants, held presentations and applied a novel percentage allocation in final deliberations so that partially funded projects received an equitable share when full funding was not possible. The committee noted one notable denial: a new Park City baseball request for under $100,000 toward an overall project exceeding $2 million; members said the proposal lacked leverage and wider stakeholder support.

Council members asked for clarity on geographic diversification and whether the Chamber’s recurring receipt of TRT funds warranted additional council guidance. Committee members said they track total organizational budgets and project-specific leverage but have not adopted firm geographic benchmarks; staff and councilors encouraged the committee to return data summaries (project by location and amount) in future reports.

The council moved to approve the committee’s recommendations as presented; the motion carried unanimously.