Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Winter Sports School topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission approves Winter Sports School Phase 2 conditional use permit amendment with one abstention
Summary
The Snyderville Basin Planning Commission approved a conditional use permit amendment allowing the Winter Sports School to build an amphitheater and expand facilities for summer instruction. Staff said the school’s Phase 2 student cap is about 60 (down from a previous 230), and traffic engineers did not require a new traffic study; one commissioner abstained due to a stated board affiliation.
The Snyderville Basin Planning Commission on March 14 voted to approve a Phase 2 amendment to the conditional use permit for the Winter Sports School, allowing a roughly 10,000‑square‑foot expansion and an outdoor amphitheater intended for use as an outdoor classroom. The motion passed 6–0 with one abstention from a commissioner who disclosed membership on the school’s governing board and said he would refrain from voting.
Senior planning staff told the commission the proposal meets code on setbacks, heights and wetland protections and that engineering and traffic review did not flag significant impacts. “The school is looking at about a 60 maximum students at this time,” staff said, contrasting that number with an earlier approved cap of up to 230 students.
During public comment, resident Debbie Scoggin urged the commission to consider traffic and parking mitigation around Old Branch Road and Shadow Mountain Lane, warning that increased activity during overlapping sports events could create bottlenecks. “This is a problem waiting to happen,” she said, and suggested staggered dismissal times or trigger‑based mitigation measures be included in the permit.
Commissioners pressed staff and the applicant on what enforcement authority the county would have for mitigation and whether additional parking would be added. Staff replied that Phase 1 parking was already built to the previously approved maximum and that the Phase 2 work largely reuses existing infrastructure; the only notable site change is a relocated dumpster area to accommodate capacity. Staff also described grading and berming for the amphitheater and clarified the structure remains under the 32‑foot height limit in the code.
Chair and commissioners expressed appreciation for public input and for staff analysis. Commissioner Carmichael moved approval “pursuant to the findings of fact, conclusions of law and conditions of approval in the staff report.” The commission adopted the motion, 6 in favor, 0 opposed, 1 abstention. The abstaining commissioner had disclosed in advance that he serves on the school’s governing board and would not participate in the vote.
The commission’s approval authorizes the Phase 2 construction per the staff report; any future expansion beyond the scope approved would require additional review and likely involve further scrutiny of parking and traffic implications.
