Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Recreation Planning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Basin Recreation outlines multi‑phase vision for Silver Creek Village parcels, urges early planning steps
Summary
Basin Recreation presented conceptual master‑plan ideas for two district parcels near the I‑80/US‑40 interchange at Silver Creek Village, prioritizing trails, a maintenance facility and an indoor recreation center (aquatics and climbing). Staff said zoning, development‑agreement amendments and possible variances should be addressed early.
Basin Recreation told the Snyderville Basin Planning Commission on July 9 that its ideas for nearly 100 acres of district‑owned land in the Silver Creek Village Center are conceptual and intended to guide a long‑term strategic plan rather than immediate construction. Dana Jones, the district director, said the district spent more than a year compiling a 10‑year strategic plan, a five‑year trails and open‑space plan and a development plan for the site, and that public outreach included open houses, focus groups, a youth forum and a statistically valid bond survey.
Planning supervisor Matt (surname withheld in the transcript) walked commissioners through a site analysis that noted two separately described parcels, rural residential zoning, proximity to I‑80 and US‑40, sloping terrain and a small wetland area that could be conserved. The presentation outlined phased development: early work to extend trails and build a maintenance/fleet facility (phase 1); outdoor athletic fields (phase 2); and an indoor recreation facility split into stages (phase 3) with indoor aquatics and climbing among top priorities identified by the bond survey and outreach.
Why it matters: Basin Recreation said many of its existing amenities are reaching capacity, and the district wants to identify code, zoning and development‑agreement hurdles before moving from concept to schematic design. The district’s timeline indicates program refinement and schematic work beginning in quarter 3 of 2024 for portions of the site.
Commissioners questioned the survey framing, asked for data about current facility usage and staffing, and urged the district to share the Silver Creek Village development agreement and any MOU that could affect permitted uses. Commissioners also flagged transportation and connectivity as central design tradeoffs: several emphasized the need for high‑quality multiuse routes and clearer transit or access solutions before a bond or larger construction commitments.
Basin Recreation staff said trails were the highest community priority and that the district is already building another trail to start implementing a connected system. The bond survey showed strong favorability for outdoor groomed winter trails, indoor climbing and indoor aquatics, though some amenities (for example, indoor turf conversion or drop‑in childcare) ranked lower. Staff cautioned that pools and large indoor facilities are expensive to operate and that staffing and operational models would be developed in later fiscal and feasibility analyses.
Next steps: Basin Recreation asked the commission for early feedback on zoning constraints, potential development‑agreement amendments and whether variances (for example, building height) might be required. Commissioners asked for the development agreement and related exhibits and recommended staff‑led follow‑up on access, parking, and a possible site visit as concepts are refined.
