Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Property Tax topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
County ratifies tax‑sale results; withdraws overlapping parcel after SITLA title conflict
Summary
Summit County ratified its 2024 tax‑sale results: one parcel was struck off to the county after failing to attract bids, one sale remains pending payment, and the council agreed to withdraw a parcel from the sale after an ownership overlap with the State Institutional Trust Lands Administration (SITLA) was discovered.
Summit County staff reported on outcomes from the county’s 2024 tax sale and the council ratified updated results following title issues and bid irregularities.
Chief among the outcomes, staff reported a discovered overlapping ownership issue for parcel PCA‑S‑46‑A: an ownership overlap meant part of the parcel was also recorded to the State Institutional Trust Lands Administration (SITLA). County staff and recorder’s office determined SITLA holds senior claim; because SITLA had not been notified in the required timeframe, the county withdrew that parcel from the sale and will work with the recorder, county attorney and interested parties to clear title. United Park City Mines agreed to quitclaim the overlapping portion to SITLA, county staff said.
Another parcel (PCA‑89) failed to attract a bid meeting the minimum (taxes, interest, penalties and fees) and was struck off to Summit County, making the county the owner and available for future disposition. A third parcel sold at auction but the high bidder failed to pay; county staff contacted the second‑highest bidder, who agreed to purchase the property at a price slightly below the winning bid, pending payment and deed execution.
County staff asked the council to ratify these outcomes: (1) sale of MSDE‑RES pending payment by the winning bidder (deadline 05/28/2024); (2) PCA‑89 unsold and struck off to Summit County; and (3) withdrawal of PCA‑S‑46‑A from the sale because of overlapping SITLA ownership. Council voted to ratify the results by voice vote.
Council members asked about possible uses for PCA‑89 (a roughly four‑acre hillside parcel near Park City Heights) and staff noted they had received an inquiry from an interested party; staff said they will follow county policy for disposition or reuse. The county will finalize deeds and follow statutory notification requirements during follow‑up steps.
