Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Property Tax topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council denies discretionary tax abatement for property owner who said he did not receive notices
Summary
Summit County denied a discretionary tax-abatement request from Steve Evans for parcel LR-3-191-AM after county staff concluded there was no county error; Evans said he did not receive required notices because of mailbox delivery issues, but council cited taxpayer responsibility for maintaining correct mailing addresses.
The Summit County Council considered a discretionary tax-abatement request from property owner Steve Evans for parcel LR-3-191-AM. County staff (Stephanie Paul) recommended denial, saying there was no county error: statutory disclosure notices and tax statements were mailed and the county uses the warranty deed and recorded mailing address on file.
Steve Evans told the council he purchased the property in 2019 and that mail-delivery problems at his community mailbox (box F2) had caused him not to receive several notices; he said his checks were nevertheless mailed on time and he paid taxes when he called to ask amounts. Council members reviewed the packet of tax notices shown on the public record and discussed the county's outreach (email and printed flyers) and statutory disclosure process. The legal and treasurer's offices said the taxpayer is responsible for keeping his mailing address current through the recorder.
Council members emphasized consistency with prior abatement decisions and denied the discretionary abatement by motion and vote.
