Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Land Use Planning topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Planning commission approves Promontory Vista plat amendment to combine Lots 15 and 16

Eastern Summit County Planning Commission · December 5, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Eastern Summit County Planning Commission approved a plat amendment to combine Lots 15 and 16 in the Promontory Vista subdivision, preserving plat note size limits and carrying forward a revised single building pad; the motion passed unanimously after staff and the applicant described no density increase and no public objections.

The Eastern Summit County Planning Commission approved a plat amendment to combine Lots 15 and 16 in the Promontory Vista subdivision and to revise the building pad for the combined lot. Planning staff told commissioners the change keeps the existing plat note governing minimum and maximum building size and does not increase overall residential density.

Madeline, planning staff, summarized the application and said the existing recorded plat shows two building pads—one on each lot—and the applicant proposes to merge the two lots and the pads into a single lot and single building pad. Madeline told the commission that staff found the proposal complies with Section 11-4-5 of the development code, that public notice had been given, and recommended approval “pursuant to the findings of fact, conclusions of law, and conditions of approval in the staff report.”

John Lane, the architect representing the applicant, said the client seeks a larger single home on the combined lot and confirmed he did not have direct knowledge of any private contacts with the uphill neighbor but that neighbors would have been notified via the public-notice process. Lane said, “I’m the architect on the project representing the client.”

Commissioners asked for technical clarifications. One commissioner noted the combined building pad appeared smaller than the two original pads; Madeline confirmed that was the case and the applicant said the design keeps the building area under Promontory’s guideline of roughly 70 percent of the combined area. Another commissioner asked about maximum square footage: Madeline explained that a combined lot carries a maximum of 12,000 square feet per the plat note and that final square-foot calculations are subject to the design-review committee’s measurement method.

Chair opened the public hearing and the commission received no public opposition. Sean Potter appeared on behalf of Promontory and was recorded as indicating Promontory had no objection to the application.

Commissioner Clint moved to approve the Promontory Vista plat amendment under the findings and conditions in the staff report; the motion was seconded and the commission took a roll-call vote. Don, Clint, Bill, Marion, Dave and the chair voted yes and the chair declared the motion approved unanimously.

The commission recorded the approval and moved on to other agenda business; staff will carry forward the plat note limiting building sizes to the revised plat and the matter will proceed per the conditions specified in the staff report.