Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Civic Accountability topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Palm Bay council meeting dominated by public outcry over council member's remarks about Muslims; calls for accountability
Summary
Dozens of residents at the Feb. 6 Palm Bay City Council meeting denounced recent comments by Councilman Chandler Langevin they described as anti-Muslim and called for apologies, ethics investigations and consequences. The mayor and other council members publicly addressed the controversy and defended religious freedom.
Dozens of residents denounced remarks they said were made by Councilman Chandler Langevin and urged the Palm Bay City Council to hold him accountable at a sometimes emotional public-comment period on Feb. 6.
Multiple speakers described comments they said had suggested Muslims do not belong in the United States and noted statements advocating military action abroad. "Council Langevin, your incendiary comments shunning Muslim Americans and advocating for bombing Lebanon ... is unjustifiable and blatantly un-American," said Kelly Colamberte, a student and resident who asked for an apology from the council member. Other speakers invoked local Muslim community contributions, citing long-serving judges and health-care providers.
Speaker Bayan Saleh told the council the rhetoric "does not represent who we are" and urged the city to protect religious freedom and inclusion. David Kearns, a longtime resident, said he planned to file an ethics complaint and urged other residents to do the same after the city moniker was used on social posts he said displayed a religious preference.
Mayor Rob Medina responded near the meeting's end, saying the council and the city "honor your religion" and emphasizing respect for residents of all faiths: "Just like I could say Jesus Christ is Lord, you can say Muhammad," he told the audience. He called for decorum and urged speakers to seek common ground.
Councilman Langevin addressed the council during his member report later in the meeting and defended his remarks, saying he had meant to critique "the political component" of an ideology and that he would not apologize: "I said that the ideology of Islam, particularly the political component, does not belong in The United States," he said. That statement drew further public reaction during the meeting.
Several residents and speakers at the meeting asked the council to consider formal ethics proceedings or other consequences; others urged dialogue and reconciliation. City staff and other council members repeatedly stressed the council's duty to protect constitutional rights and public participation.
The council did not take a formal disciplinary vote at the Feb. 6 meeting. Several speakers asked that any review be carried out through the city's official ethics and reporting channels, and some residents said they would pursue formal complaints.
What happens next: The controversy dominated public comment and was acknowledged by multiple members of the council during reports; council members and staff said they would consider available options under city ethics rules and follow established procedures for complaints. No formal sanctions or votes were taken on Feb. 6.
