Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Parks topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Residents urge Riverbank to reserve Jackson Avenue site for neighborhood park, criticize proposed tiny-home allocation

City Council and Local Redevelopment Authority, City of Riverbank · April 9, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Multiple residents told council a two-acre parcel at Stanislaus and Jackson should include a neighborhood park rather than be filled predominantly with tiny homes; speakers said the developer’s proposed 1/12-acre park dedication is inadequate and asked council to revisit the earlier 5–0 purchase decision.

Residents at the April 9 Riverbank council meeting urged the city to preserve park acreage at a Jackson Avenue site that has been discussed for a neighborhood park and for small housing development.

Former council member Cal Campbell (Speaker 9) said the District 3 neighborhood that includes the proposed site lacks a neighborhood park and described prior council discussion to acquire the two-acre parcel. Campbell said council previously voted 5–0 to repurchase the land and objected to proposals that would allocate most of the parcel to tiny homes. “Why not put just 9 tiny houses on it,” Campbell said, “and have the acreage there for a park.”

Rich Homer (Speaker 10) backed that view and invoked a park-equity standard that, in his account, historically required roughly one acre per 1,000 people; he said a developer proposal to dedicate 1/12 of an acre for a park would be “ridiculous” and urged at least a half-acre be devoted to park space.

Others who commented during public comment reiterated the need for neighborhood open space in District 3 and asked the council to reconsider the balance between tiny-home development and public-recreation space. Council members acknowledged the comments and indicated the item would be part of ongoing land-use and housing element conversations, with additional workshops and stakeholder meetings planned.

No formal action on the Jackson Avenue site was taken at the meeting; public comments were heard under the comment rules and the council proceeded to the consent calendar and later to the housing element item.