Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Portfolio Assessments Letter topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board forms subcommittee to draft legislative letter seeking removal of portfolio requirement, citing equity concerns
Summary
Following prolonged discussion about equity and monitoring of a proposed in‑district teacher pathway, the board voted to convene a subcommittee to draft a letter to the legislature asking that nationally recognized portfolio assessments (edTPA/PPAT) be removed from statute; members said a literature review and targeted talking points will accompany the request.
After extended comment from higher-education representatives and researchers, the Professional Standards Board voted to form a subcommittee to draft a legislative letter asking the General Assembly to consider removing nationally recognized portfolio assessments (edTPA and PPAT) from statute for Maryland‑approved programs.
What members said: Board member Darren raised concerns that the proposed in‑district pathway could generate inequities if candidates in that route are not subject to the same portfolio requirements as candidates in traditional programs. Several members in higher education agreed and urged rigorous literature review to support any legislative request; Dr. Zebly asked that any studies or citations be attached to the letter.
Subcommittee and timeline: The chair solicited volunteers and recorded a subcommittee that includes higher-ed, principal and nonpublic representatives (members who volunteered during the meeting include Dr. Taylor, Joyce Spain, Janelle Bobbitt, Stephanie Farmer, Darren and Dr. Zebly). The board approved the motion by voice/roll call and asked staff and counsel to verify open‑meetings rules for the subgroup. Members discussed meeting quickly so the committee’s product can reach supportive legislators early in the session.
Why it matters: The portfolio assessments are currently required by statute for Maryland-approved programs beginning 07/01/2025. Board members and commenters said the portfolio requirement can impose cost and access burdens and that pass rates for these assessments can be disproportionately low for some minority groups. The subcommittee will draft talking points and collect referenced studies so legislators can review evidence if they pursue statutory change.
Next steps: The subcommittee plans to meet shortly after adjournment to pick meeting dates; the chair may route a draft letter through the full board for a vote or, as counsel advised, the chair has administrative authority to transmit a letter depending on the board’s desired level of formal endorsement. The board asked staff to consult the legislative liaison about submission logistics and timing.
