Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Historic Preservation topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Residents urge stronger tribal consultation, preservation language after shooting-range dispute

Meade County Board of Commissioners · June 11, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Public commenters at the Meade County meeting urged the commission to require tribal consultation and include protections for cultural and historic resources in county policies after a contested shooting-range design and related federal/state reviews.

Multiple public commenters asked Meade County officials to strengthen protections for cultural and historic resources and to require tribal consultation for projects that may affect such sites. Speakers referenced a shooting-range project where a historic resource was identified and urged county policy changes to avoid future conflicts.

An attendee referred to a past shooting-range design review and said the State Historic Preservation Office and US Fish and Wildlife had advised Game, Fish and Parks that tribes needed to be consulted after design changes; the commenter said bids proceeded despite those recommendations and expressed concern that archaeological features (described in the record as stone cairns) were vulnerable to disturbance.

At the comprehensive-plan hearing, Nancy Helding of the Prairie Health Audubon Society asked commissioners to add language to the plan to "identify and protect significant cultural and historical resources" and to direct county staff to collaborate with tribal, state and federal partners when development could affect cultural sites. "You should put in collaborate with local, state, tribal and federal agencies," she said.

County staff acknowledged public concerns; the planning and commission record shows public comments will be retained as part of the implementation process. Commissioners did not adopt new language on the spot but accepted the public record and moved forward with plan adoption; staff said implementation and future amendments can address additional protective measures if the board so directs.