Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Emergency Medical Services topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Faith Ambulance seeks $5,000; commissioners discuss ambulance districts and long‑term funding

Meade County Board of Commissioners · August 27, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Faith Ambulance requested $5,000 in county support for continued service in a large rural area. Commissioners discussed interim county support options and the longer‑term mechanism of ambulance taxing districts or service areas, noting logistical complexity across county lines.

Representatives of Faith Ambulance asked the county for $5,000 to help cover rising costs after the local service was closed for two years and to support the substation arrangement that now serves a broad rural area. The Faith representative said the service receives modest annual support from neighboring counties (Ziebach reported $4,000 annually) and that Medicaid and Medicare reimbursements and increased operating costs strain small volunteer or city‑supported services.

Commissioners discussed possible funding sources and structural options. Some suggested the county consider interim outside‑agency funds while communities pursue ambulance service districts (taxing districts or service areas) that would assess residents for ongoing support; county counsel noted those arrangements require referenda and can be complicated when services cross county lines. Commissioners also noted previous one‑time county support arrangements to bridge funding until a taxing district could be established.

No decision was reached at the meeting; commissioners said the request would be considered as part of outside‑agency appropriations during budget deliberations and asked staff to research potential funding pathways and constraints, including whether restricted opioid settlement funds could be used for ambulance operations or training.