Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Courthouse Security topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board weighs $2.62 million sally port alternative for courthouse inmate-holding
Summary
Supervisors reviewed a scaled sally port/inmate-holding option estimated at $2.62 million as a lower-cost alternative to a $28–36 million courthouse renovation and discussed financing options including a 13‑year note and regional funds to avoid local tax increases.
Get email alerts on the Courthouse Security topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Scott County supervisors reviewed a scaled sally port/inmate-holding proposal and discussed financing options to avoid a full courthouse replacement.
County staff reported a Moseley Architects estimate of $2,621,900 for a reduced‑scope sally port and inmate-holding project intended to improve security and move inmates off the courthouse floor. Staff described a 13‑year financing option with estimated annual debt service of about $260,000 and said regional improvement commission funds from casino-related receipts could help cover debt service so local taxpayers would not shoulder the full cost.
Supervisors discussed alternatives, including using a shipping-container-style holding unit the transcript calls a “Connex box,” remote video arraignment (which the courthouse can do at the judge’s discretion) and repurposing the old library for office/hall space. One supervisor emphasized the scaled option saves money and preserves room on the courthouse campus for future expansion; another urged careful evaluation of how the project would affect long‑term county budgets.
The board moved to allow staff to proceed with final drawings and contract steps and to pursue financing options; the motion carried by voice vote with one supervisor recorded as opposing during the discussion. Staff said the project is a practical immediate remedy to address current inmate‑holding safety concerns while avoiding the higher cost of full courthouse construction.
What to watch: Staff will return with drawings, a final contract scope and financing terms; the board signaled preference to avoid using general taxpayer funds for debt service if regional or targeted funding is available.

