Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Regional Transportation Authority topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Stafford supervisors hear FAMPO model showing $30 million-a-year need for regional transportation authority
Summary
FAMPO consultants presented a funding model for a proposed Regional Transportation Authority (RTA) that estimates roughly $30 million per year to fund one-third of sampled regional projects if all five jurisdictions participate, and flagged legislative resistance if key counties opt out.
FAMPO consultants outlined what a Regional Transportation Authority (RTA) could look like for Planning District 16 and walked supervisors through a high-level financial model aimed at unlocking federal and SmartScale grants.
Ian Olas, the consultant who introduced the analysis, said the subcommittee favored a 70/30 split of revenue — with 70% retained by the authority for regional projects and 30% returned to jurisdictions — and illustrated the model by funding one representative project in each of the five jurisdictions. "If we're gonna fund them up to a third of their cost, we would need about 30,000,000 a year over 6 years to fund one third of the total cost of all of those projects," Olas said.
Olas and transportation planner John Rideout emphasized the examples were illustrative. They said the authority could provide a local match to improve competitiveness for federal grants and SmartScale, not to fully pay for large projects. "We would propose that the region uses those funds to be the local match for SmartScale or the local match for a federal grant," Olas said.
Board members pressed for a Stafford-only view of the numbers and asked what participation by fewer jurisdictions would mean. Supervisors repeatedly asked how much Stafford would pay versus receive if only the county and the city of Fredericksburg joined. "If only the city of Fredericksburg and the Stafford County were in the RTA ... your cost would go down drastically because you wouldn't fund those projects," Olas said, adding income would also shrink because revenues would come only from participating jurisdictions.
Legislative prospects surfaced as a key constraint: board members reported new information that Senator McPike has signaled he would not advance RTA legislation unless all affected localities were favorable. Kathy Bircher, a consultant working with the county, confirmed legislators are cautious about bills that proceed without full regional consensus. "He is very concerned ... about ensuring that all the localities participate so that there's maximum benefit," Bircher said.
Supervisors discussed governance questions — who would sit on an RTA board and whether non-elected officials would have votes — and the competitive impact of recent SmartScale changes that merge regions into statewide competition. Olas warned that without a regional funding vehicle, Stafford-area applications will compete against large RTAs in Northern Virginia, Richmond and Hampton Roads that already contribute substantial local match.
The consultants offered to return with jurisdiction-specific slides and additional analysis. The presentation was informational and no formal action was taken.
