Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Zoning Text Amendments topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission shortens proposed reapplication restriction to 6 months and forwards zoning text amendment
Summary
The planning commission amended a staff proposal to allow reapplication for a denied conditional use permit after six months (staff proposed one year) and forwarded the text amendment—covering expiration, extension and a $100 extension fee—to the Board of Supervisors with a recommendation of approval.
The Warren County Planning Commission on Dec. 11 debated and amended a proposed zoning text change affecting conditional use permits (CUPs) before forwarding the change to the Board of Supervisors.
Planning staff introduced a draft ordinance to clarify termination, expiration, extension, and reapplication procedures for conditional uses. Under the proposed text, administrative expiration could allow the zoning administrator to expire a conditional use permit if it has not been established within three calendar years or if the use has been abandoned for three calendar years; the proposal would require the zoning administrator to send a certified notice of impending expiration and grant the permit holder 30 days to apply for an extension. Staff also proposed adding a $100 application fee for board-requested extensions and adding a requirement for the planning commission to hold at least one public hearing before making a recommendation to the Board for termination of a CUP.
Staff said the draft also proposes restricting reapplication for a conditional use permit within one year of a Board denial, relying on the locality’s authority under Virginia Code §15.2-2310 to establish such a time limit. The county attorney explained the statute allows a locality to set a reapplication period not exceeding one year for special exceptions or conditional use permits.
Several commissioners raised a past case where a denied applicant’s circumstances changed (for example, a neighbor's ownership changed) and argued that a one-year prohibition could unfairly block applicants whose circumstances reasonably change. Commissioners proposed shorter alternatives, including 90 days, 180 days or six months. Staff noted the typical CUP process takes roughly three months and that administrative burdens and the risk of repeated reapplications were the rationale for the limit.
After discussion, a commissioner moved to amend the draft to set the reapplication restriction at six months (rather than one year) and to forward the amended ordinance to the Board of Supervisors with a recommendation of approval. The motion was seconded and carried on a voice vote.
The planning commission's recommendation is advisory; the Board of Supervisors will consider the amended text at its public hearings.
Key points staff included in the proposal were the $100 extension fee, separation of administrative expiration procedures from termination procedures, and an express note that zoning staff must give 30 days' notice before administratively expiring a permit under the proposed process.
