Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Administration Coroner Qualifications topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee advances coroner‑qualification bill requiring pre‑service training and candidate fingerprint/background checks
Summary
A bill to require coroners to complete forensic training before assuming office and to submit fingerprint/background checks (with candidate‑filed delivery and time‑of‑filing amendments) was amended and reported favorably by roll call (transcript reports 18 yeas, 2 nays, 4 not voting); members debated singling out coroners versus applying checks to all elected officials.
The committee considered a coroner‑qualification bill (referred to in the transcript as '03/1948' and later as 'h 30 48') that would require candidates for coroner to complete forensic science certification before taking office and to provide fingerprints and background checks. Sponsors said the proposal responds to concerns about coroners’ access to homes and to personal effects after deaths.
Key provisions and amendments: the sponsor explained that SLED could not transmit candidate fingerprints directly to counties, so the bill, as amended, requires candidates to present fingerprint/background materials to their county executive committee (party executive committee) and clarified filing timing. Committee members questioned why coroners were singled out; Representative King offered an amendment to require fingerprinting of all elected officials, but committee members raised germaneness and scope concerns and tabled that amendment. Members also asked whether disqualification standards should be limited to violent felonies; one member suggested restricting the disqualification to violent felonies rather than nonviolent ones.
A procedural amendment clarified the timing for fingerprint/background submission — members agreed it made sense to require results at the time of filing rather than 130 days before the primary/general election. The committee then held a roll‑call vote on the coroner bill as amended; the transcript records the outcome as 18 in favor, 2 against and 4 not voting and reports that the bill "receives a favorable report." The clerk read member votes aloud during the roll call.
Quotations: supporters cited the Coroners Association’s request and framed the change as intended to improve the quality of death investigations and protect decedents’ property; critics warned of potential chilling or weaponization effects if requirements were expanded beyond coroners.
Next steps: With the roll‑call favorable report, the bill is reported out of committee as amended and will proceed to the next legislative stage per House rules.
Provenance: Topic runs from the bill introduction at SEG 1017 through the roll call and favorable report concluding near SEG 1695.
