Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Pdh Pdc Secondary Uses topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Staff proposes more flexible secondary-use rules for PDH and PDC districts

Fairfax County Land Use Policy Committee · November 26, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

DPD told the committee it recommends retaining limits on commercial land area in PDH districts while simplifying PDC secondary-use limits to allow up to 75% of a development to be residential or other secondary uses; staff also recommended requiring a meets-and-bounds legal description with partial final development-plan amendments.

DPD staff presented proposed amendments to use standards in plan-development housing (PDH) and plan-development commercial (PDC) districts designed to improve clarity and administration.

For PDH districts, staff recommended retaining the existing restriction that limits commercial land area (including parking) relative to the number of dwelling units but easing certain office-specific restrictions they consider unnecessary. For PDC districts, staff said the current principal-use-based formula (which limits residential and other secondary uses by reference to principal uses) is hard to interpret and enforce; staff proposed instead a simpler standard that would permit up to 75% of the total development to be residential or other secondary uses, a change staff said better matches recent PDC approvals (staff noted the Board has modified these provisions in over 60% of cases in the past decade).

Separately, staff recommended tightening submission requirements for partial final-development-plan amendments by adding a mandatory meets-and-bounds legal description (in addition to bearings and distances) to reduce instances where applicants refuse to provide information that staff customarily requests but cannot require under current ordinance language.

The committee thanked staff for the background paper and indicated they would "move forward on this" item. Staff will continue outreach and incorporate committee feedback into draft ordinance language for future review.