Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Municipal Budget topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Daggett County Municipal Building Authority closes public hearing on 2024 amendment and 2025 budget; clinic funding questions deferred

Daggett County Municipal Building Authority · December 17, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Daggett County Municipal Building Authority closed a public hearing on proposed amendments to the 2024 MBA budget and the adoption of the 2025 MBA budget after receiving no public comment; board members asked whether clinic-related expenses and reimbursements are included and agreed to defer the item to a regular MBA meeting.

Daggett County Municipal Building Authority officials closed a public hearing on proposed amendments to the 2024 Municipal Building Authority (MBA) budget and the adoption of the 2025 MBA budget after no members of the public offered comments.

The hearing opened with the authority’s moderator announcing the subject of the meeting and inviting public comment on the budget resolutions. “Are there any members of the public that would like to make public comment today concerning either Resolution 24-02 MBA or Resolution 24-03 MBA?” the moderator asked.

A board member pressed staff for clarification on whether the 2024 amendment and the 2025 budget were being considered together. The moderator replied they are being considered separately but that the public hearing was intended to address both.

The same board member asked when a proposed clinic would be added to the MBA financials, saying they could not find a line item in the materials: “But that I guess it at the at what point do we add in the clinic as it relates to the MDA. And I I am not deciphering it from what's here.” The moderator said there have been no clinic expenditures charged to the CIV funds to date and suggested any clinic-related charges would be reimbursable if incurred.

Board discussion briefly touched on potential billing from the contractor Jones and DeMille and whether planned work would be funded by a bond or loan. The board member noted, “I don't think the architect's working for free,” and questioned how payments would be routed if the hospital were to pay some costs.

To save time and because a staff member (referred to as Carrie in the hearing) had not yet arrived, the moderator recommended deferring a detailed clinic-budget discussion to the regular MBA meeting. After confirming there were no public comments, the moderator closed the public hearing and returned the meeting to regular MBA business.

No motions or votes on either budget were recorded during the public hearing. The authority moved on to housekeeping items with plans to address the clinic and related budget questions in the regular MBA meeting.