Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Personnel Compensation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee debates adding merit-like adjustment to elected-official pay; estimated $81,006 impact
Summary
Committee members discussed whether to add an average employee merit adjustment to elected-official pay, increasing the projected 0.5% to a combined 3.3% and producing an estimated $81,006.28 additional cost; no final decision was made.
Committee members discussed whether elected officials should receive the same merit-like adjustments that county employees receive.
Chris Coe, the county auditor, was asked to recap the personnel budget projection. An unidentified participant flagged that the current projection already includes a 0.5% increase for elected officials. The same speaker proposed adding the average employee merit (about 2.8%) to that base, producing a combined 3.3% adjustment. That speaker said the full 3.3% would add “$81,006.28 and 56¢” to the county’s payroll projection and noted the projection already included 0.5%.
Members debated options for implementing any increase. One participant warned of a possible perverse incentive if pay were tiered such that long-serving officials received step increases over many years. Another suggested a limited tiered approach tied to terms—e.g., progression over six years—to balance experience and the starting pay for newly elected officials. No formal motion to change the projected 0.5% in the budget was made, and committee members agreed to schedule additional meetings to develop any proposed changes for inclusion in the final budget.
The discussion clarified that the current published personnel projection contains only a half-percent increase for elected officials; any larger adjustment would require committee direction and explicit inclusion in the final budget.
