Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Real Property topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Daggett County Commission votes to enter closed session to discuss potential real property transaction
Summary
The Daggett County Commission moved into a closed session under Utah Code 52-4-205 to discuss a possible purchase, exchange or lease of real property. The motion was made by Commissioner Tibbetts and seconded by Commissioner AC; the transcript records ayes from attendees named Randy, Matt Tippett and Jack Lytle. No further public details were recorded in the provided transcript.
The Daggett County Commission voted to enter a closed session on a possible real property transaction during a meeting that resumed from recess at about 11:05 a.m., according to the public transcript.
The moderator announced, "We have a closed session," and said the purpose was related to "purchase exchange or lease of real property" and cited Utah Code 52-4-205 as the statutory authority for the closed meeting. Commissioner Tibbetts moved to go into closed session and Commissioner AC seconded the motion. When the chair called for those in favor, the record shows affirmative responses from individuals identified in the transcript as Randy, Matt Tippett and Jack Lytle.
The transcript does not provide additional details about the property, the parties involved, or any follow-up actions. The commission’s public record in the provided transcript ends with the voice vote that approved entering the closed session. Any decisions made during the closed session are not recorded in this public excerpt of the meeting.
Under Utah law cited by the commission (Utah Code 52-4-205), certain discussions about real property may be held in closed session; the transcript records the statutory citation but does not include further explanation from staff or commissioners about the rationale or the affected parcel.
The meeting location was stated as the Daggett County Commission Chambers. The transcript did not identify the roles of the individuals who voiced "aye" beyond the names given in the record, nor did it supply further public detail about the closed-session agenda item.
