Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Solar Project topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Proposed 200 MW Zeus solar project deemed "substantially in accord" by planning commission; residents raise environmental and compliance concerns
Summary
Planning staff reported the Planning Commission found Zeus Energy LLC’s utility‑scale solar and 100 MW battery storage project substantially in accord with the comprehensive plan; at public comment residents alleged prior environmental violations by the developer and questioned impacts to wetlands, soils and views.
The Brunswick County Planning Department reported that the Planning Commission unanimously found conditional use permit application CUP 23‑006 for a proposed utility‑scale solar facility was "substantially in accord" with the county comprehensive plan, clearing the way for further negotiations on siting agreements and a joint public hearing with the Board of Supervisors.
Planning staff said the proposal, filed under CUP 23‑006, would install photovoltaic solar generation with a rated capacity of 200 megawatts and a 100‑megawatt battery energy storage system across multiple parcels totaling more than 1,100 acres. The application identifies single‑axis tracking photovoltaic arrays and includes dedicated acreage for point of interconnection and a medium‑voltage easement path.
Planning staff and the Berkeley Group reviewed the application against the comprehensive plan and recommended review under Virginia Code procedures for public utility facilities; the Planning Commission voted unanimously that the proposal is substantially in accord for six enumerated reasons. Staff told the board the next steps are to negotiate a siting agreement with the applicant and schedule a joint public hearing between the Planning Commission and the Board of Supervisors.
During the public comment period Anne Moore raised detailed objections to the project’s asserted benefits and questioned the developer’s environmental record. Moore said the company referenced in public comments (transcribed variably as "Innergex" and "Energex") had been fined by the state Department of Environmental Quality and cited in a consent order with numerous violations. She asked how a utility‑scale solar project would materially improve local community resilience and challenged assertions that mitigation measures would address wetland and soil impacts. Moore said one affected landowner’s experience had been poor and urged the board to scrutinize whether the company is the right fit for Brunswick County.
Planning staff and the board noted that the Planning Commission’s action was a limited review of consistency with the comprehensive plan and that subsequent steps include negotiating terms with the applicant and scheduling further public hearings where environmental impacts, mitigation, easements, and conditions will be considered.
