Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Public Safety topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Resident urges Campbell County to enforce fireworks rules in Darlington Creek; officials cite enforcement limits

Campbell County Fiscal Court · July 17, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

A resident asked Campbell County to increase patrols after fireworks were set off close to homes in Darlington Creek, prompting officials to say the 200-foot restriction is difficult to enforce and to offer targeted patrols and neighborhood outreach.

A resident identified only as John urged the Campbell County Fiscal Court on July 3 to enforce state fireworks restrictions and increase patrols in the Darlington Creek subdivision after repeated incidents of fireworks set off close to homes.

"There's not a spot in my subdivision that's 200 feet from vehicle structure," John said, describing fireworks being set off about 40 feet from his house and saying veterans in his neighborhood with PTSD had been disturbed. He asked whether the county police could enforce the law more actively or increase patrols.

Judge Penner and county law enforcement officials acknowledged the statutory 200-foot restriction but said it is difficult to enforce in most residential settings and during community celebrations. "The police do have the authority to confiscate fireworks if they're breaking the law," Judge Penner said, adding enforcement is often impractical and that the county receives calls annually on this issue.

The county—s law enforcement representatives said extra patrols can be directed to problem areas when complaints are received and encouraged neighborhood-level solutions. The chief (unnamed) said the department can and does add patrols in specific trouble spots and offered to meet with residents and provide contact information for follow-up.

No ordinance change or formal enforcement policy was proposed or adopted at the meeting. Officials framed the issue as a community-enforcement challenge rather than one the county can fully resolve through arrests or confiscation in residential contexts.