Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Waterways topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Court discusses waterway markers and no-wake issues at Smuggler's property after Fish and Wildlife correspondence
Summary
Court members reviewed a fisheries/coast guard letter and debated who has authority over waterway markers and a no-wake designation near Smuggler's property; county staff said state and federal agencies coordinate on such designations and that prior approvals and owner actions were cited.
Get email alerts on the Waterways topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Speaker 1 briefed the court on correspondence from the Department of Fish and Wildlife and the U.S. Coast Guard regarding markers and a no-wake designation near Smuggler's property. Staff said the authorization process involved the corps of engineers, the Coast Guard, and the commissioner of Fish and Wildlife and that a prior approval letter existed from 2010.
Members debated whether the county can remove or reassign markers or whether waterway jurisdiction and enforcement rest with state or federal agencies. Speaker 1 said the new owner of the marina acted on the prior letter. The court agreed that a stakeholder meeting would be advisable and that the county's authority is limited by state and federal rules.
No formal regulatory action was taken during the meeting; the topic was discussed for clarification of roles and next steps for stakeholder engagement.
