Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Jail Renovation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Fiscal Court approves jail insulation, concrete and kitchen epoxy bids to ready dorm for program
Summary
Franklin County Fiscal Court approved three bids to renovate the county jail dorm — spray-foam insulation, concrete resurfacing, and kitchen epoxy — after debate about procurement, safety and whether some items should be rebid; the court also discussed Department of Corrections requirements before moving inmates into the space.
Frankfort — Franklin County Fiscal Court authorized three contractor awards on Aug. 28 to prepare a jail dorm for a planned substance-abuse program, approving a spray-foam insulation contract and two work packages to repair exterior concrete and renovate the kitchen.
The court voted to accept Epiphany Spray Foam’s low bid to apply two inches of closed-cell spray foam in the dorm attic, a measure staff said is needed to bring attic temperatures down so classes can be held. "We bought the place because of its beauty," public commenter Kendall said earlier; court members framed the insulation as a safety and program-enabling step.
County facilities manager Matt Wilburn told the court that two inches of closed-cell foam should allow existing HVAC units to keep the dorm comfortable and that the vendor had committed to warranty service for any immediate issues. Commissioners pressed for clarity on R‑value and building-code recommendations; one magistrate cited the state code’s guidance and asked the building inspector to confirm the target insulation level before installation.
Separately, the court approved a Precision Industries Flooring bid to grind and epoxy-coat damaged exterior concrete surfaces rather than replace them — a change driven by limited equipment access where concrete trucks cannot reach the site. Precision was also awarded the contract to remove old tile and epoxy the jail kitchen floors and walls; commissioners and staff said the kitchen work was budgeted and long overdue because prior maintenance issues created cleaning and sanitation concerns.
Several magistrates raised procurement concerns. One argued the resurfacing bid differs materially from a straight concrete replacement advertised in the legal notice and suggested rebidding; another said the county attorney had reviewed the advertisement and that the legal newspaper posting included “repair, replace, removal or repair,” which preserves alternatives. The court approved rebidding authority if needed and noted staff will revise advertisement language and seek broader outreach to attract more bidders.
Magistrates also flagged a Department of Corrections (DOC) safety issue: DOC reportedly requires certain exits and surface repairs before moving people into the dorm. County counsel advised the court it would be prudent to obtain DOC confirmation that the chosen repairs meet occupancy requirements. "If DOC is saying the repairs need to be made before anybody moves into that dorm, it would be my advice to not move the first body into that dorm until that was repaired," the county attorney said during discussion.
The court approved the three awards in the voting session: the spray-foam insulation, the concrete resurfacing and the kitchen epoxy contracts, and directed staff to circulate the final bid documents and the newspaper advertisement to magistrates for their records. The work will proceed under standard county procurement oversight; staff said the dorm program opening target remains Oct. 1 but cautioned that repairs, rebidding or DOC requirements could delay startup.
