Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the County Budget topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Estill County Fiscal Court approves ARPA and LATCF allocations to cover county payroll through 2026

Estill County Fiscal Court · December 17, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The court approved two resolutions to use American Rescue Plan Act revenue loss funding and LATCF (Local Assistance and Tribal Consistency Fund) support to cover county payroll through the period specified in each resolution; votes were taken by roll call and recorded as affirmative.

The Estill County Fiscal Court approved two separate resolutions directing federal and state/local assistance funds to cover county payroll.

Court read and approved Resolution 25-4 to utilize American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) revenue loss funding for county payroll for the period beginning July 1, 2024, until funds are fully utilized or until Dec. 31, 2026, whichever comes first. The reading instructed the court to submit an obligation determination via the US ARPA report.

A motion to approve the ARPA payroll resolution was made and carried on roll call: Judge Watson and the magistrates recorded affirmative votes.

The court also introduced and approved a resolution to use LATCF (Local Assistance and Tribal Consistency Fund) for county payroll beginning Dec. 1, 2024, until the LATCF funding is completely utilized. That motion was seconded and passed by roll call with the same affirmative votes recorded.

Both actions were presented as funding-direction resolutions; no further line-item budget changes or implementation details were specified in the reading. The court indicated staff would complete required reporting steps for ARPA and related obligation determinations.

Ending: The resolutions passed by roll-call votes and the court instructed staff to file the required reports; no additional implementation timetable or departmental assignments were specified on the record.