Utah Court of Appeals Questions Whether Premarital Assets Became Marital in Krajewski Appeal

Summary

The Utah Court of Appeals heard argument in Krajewski v. Krajewski over whether large premarital accounts remained separate or were converted to marital property by commingling; judges also probed a housing-related alimony award and a pretrial attorney-fee ruling. The court took extensive questioning and will issue a written decision.

At a morning session of the Utah Court of Appeals, the three-judge panel heard oral argument in Krajewski v. Krajewski, a family-law appeal focused on whether substantial premarital assets were converted into marital property and on the size and geographic basis of an alimony-related housing award.

“I’m not going to try to pronounce the names,” the panel chair said as he announced the case, and counsel for both sides then stated appearances. Appellant counsel Julie Nelson told the court that Utah precedent protects a married person’s right to keep separate property separate and urged the panel to treat the DJK operating account and several Morgan Stanley accounts as premarital, traceable assets rather than marital property. “There are three ways to combine separate property into marital property — commingling, contribution and equity — but underlying all of those is intent,” Nelson said during her opening.

Judges pressed both sides on whether elements of the dispute are legal questions reviewed for correctness or factual findings reviewed for abuse of…

Utah Court of Appeals Questions Whether Premarital Assets Became Marital in Krajewski Appeal

Summary

Subscribe to keep reading