Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Utah Court of Appeals hears challenge to admission of prior convictions in Hunt murder trial; court takes case under advisement
Summary
At oral argument in Cedar City, appellant’s lawyer argued that testimony and evidence of prior convictions and prison conduct prejudiced his client’s self-defense claim; the State countered that counsel reasonably used admissible impeachment evidence and the court will issue a written decision.
Cedar City — The Utah Court of Appeals heard oral argument in Hunt’s appeal over whether defense counsel’s use of the defendant’s prior convictions and prison conduct at trial deprived him of a fair trial, and took the case under advisement for a written decision.
Andrew Fitzgerald, counsel for the appellant, told the three-judge panel that he "had a moment of shock" when he read the record and saw prior bad-act evidence and testimony about the defendant’s decade in the penitentiary come before the jury. Fitzgerald said the defense’s tactic — calling witnesses who testified about the appellant’s good conduct in prison and allowing evidence of prior convictions — "put him in such a poor light that his defense failed right out of the gates," and argued the cumulative effect was so harmful that "it can't be anything but ineffective assistance of counsel."…
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to keep reading
Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.
- Unlimited articles
- AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
- Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
- Follow topics and more locations
- 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat

