Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Appeals court hears dispute over quiet-title ruling in Prado property case
Summary
In Prado v. Prado, appellants argued the trial court erred in finding a statute of limitations and in failing to make necessary findings on superiority of title; appellees argued the claims were tort-based (fraud) and time-barred. The panel took the matter under advisement.
The Utah Court of Appeals heard argument in Prado v. Prado, a dispute over whether the trial court correctly concluded appellants’ quiet-title claim was time-barred and whether the court made sufficient material findings on superior title.
Ryan James, representing appellants Jorge Prado and Josefina Luna, told the panel that Jorge's quiet-title claim “was not subject to a…
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to keep reading
Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.
- Unlimited articles
- AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
- Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
- Follow topics and more locations
- 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
