Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Tax Increment Financing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Harrison County Commission approves extension and plan amendment for Charles Pointe TIF district
Summary
The commission approved an amendment to extend Harrison County Development District 2 (Charles Pointe) and revise the project plan to permit tax-increment revenue obligations with maturities measured from issuance; bond counsel said the change facilitates potential restructuring of outstanding bonds.
The Harrison County Commission voted to extend the termination date for Harrison County Development District 2 (Charles Pointe) and to amend the district’s project plan to permit issuance of tax-increment revenue obligations with maturities measured from issuance, not creation.
Jason Turner of Steptoe & Johnson, representing county bond counsel, told the commission this was “the third time y’all have taken an official action on this” and that the West Virginia Department of Economic Development had reviewed the application; the language change would allow maturities “30 years from issuance” rather than 30 years from district creation. Turner said the amendment is intended to “facilitate the possibility of doing” a restructuring of outstanding bonds and that any restructure would return to the commission for approval.
A commissioner raised the project’s financial history, saying the developer’s 2008 bonds carry an outstanding principal of about $28,000,000 and, with accrued interest, roughly $36,000,000; the commissioner also said CED assessments stood near $16,000,000. The commissioner asked whether the commission should require evidence that the bonds could be paid during the extended term before approving an extension; Turner replied that restructuring plans and repayment details would be negotiated with bondholders and that issuance terms and any bond sale would require a separate, later approval by the commission.
The commission approved the motion by voice vote. No roll-call tally was provided in the public record; the motion was carried by the commission’s voice vote.
Why it matters: The amendment changes how maximum maturities are measured and creates a procedural pathway for bond restructuring tied to tax-increment revenues in the Charles Pointe district. Commissioners said it preserves flexibility for future bond terms but indicated outstanding debt and repayment plans remain unsettled and would be addressed in subsequent proceedings.
What happens next: If a bond restructuring is proposed, any specific issuance or refunding plan must be presented to the commission for approval and will include further financial details and legal documents.
