Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Drainage Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Chickasaw County supervisors direct staff to draft policy on tile crossings and farm pumping across roads
Summary
Supervisors on Sept. 16 asked staff to draft a county policy governing drainage tile crossings and the installation of dual-wall pumping lines across secondary roads, after engineers outlined Iowa Code procedures, neighboring-county reimbursement examples, and concerns about taxpayer liability and long-term maintenance.
Chickasaw County supervisors on Sept. 16 directed staff to draft a formal policy to govern drainage tile crossings and the installation of pumping lines across county roads, a step officials said would provide consistent treatment for landowners and county crews.
Engineer Grama Lensing presented the issue, noting there is no single statewide standard and that practices vary by county. Lensing summarized Iowa Code procedures and outlined options: require an adequate outlet and decline participation, pay a capped reimbursement for materials and labor, or participate on a percentage basis. "Some counties do a dollar-per-linear-foot for labor and cover tile material," Lensing said while reviewing neighboring examples.
Board discussion centered on two tensions: supervisors who said taxpayers should not underwrite private farm improvements, and others who favored a middle ground so staff and future boards would have clear guidance. Members reviewed sample figures cited by Lensing: Bremer County's approach (about $500 maximum plus $50 per inch for open cut; $1,000 maximum plus $100 per inch for boring), Howard County's per-foot labor-plus-materials model, and Hancock County's 50% materials-and-installation contribution up to $2,500 for open cutting and higher caps for bored crossings.
Supervisors also discussed the statutory appeal process Lensing described, which a landowner may trigger by hiring a licensed engineer and seeking review under Iowa Code sections referenced in the presentation. The board pressed on ownership and maintenance implications for pipes installed under county roads and the possibility of including language that makes landowners responsible for replacement in cases of fire or overload.
The board reached consensus on asking staff to draft a formal policy that would draw from neighboring counties' practices and bring a proposal back for review. Lensing told the board the specific landowner project already underway would be handled as if a policy were in place and crews planned to complete installation within two weeks.
The next step is for engineering staff to prepare a written policy and a permit form for board consideration; no final policy vote was taken at the Sept. 16 meeting.
