Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Art topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Residents and Public Arts Commission urge council to preserve downtown metal-animal sculptures
Summary
At the Dec. 17 meeting residents and Public Arts Commission members told the council that Baker City's metal-animal sculptures are a key tourist draw and should be retained; the commission's founder reviewed the loan program's history and urged better public information rather than removal.
Get email alerts on the Public Art topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Several residents told the Baker City Council during public comment on Dec. 17 that the metal-animal sculptures scattered around downtown are important to the city's character and economy. Raven Martin said, "the metal animals in Baker gave Baker a very big tourist attraction," and warned that removing them would make downtown "very bleak and plain." Kate Lennig told the council that visitors come to see the animals and that the sculptures benefit "pretty much most businesses in Baker City."
Brian Vektor, who identified himself as one of the founding members of the Public Art Commission, walked the council through the history of the loan program, saying it was intended to provide beautification "at no cost to the city." He listed earlier pieces and contributors, named Don Herman as an early donor and noted several works remain in place, and pointed residents to the city's website for application criteria and program details.
Mayor Doreen and other council members acknowledged receipt of many emails on the topic, described the controversy as surprising, and said there was no intent to "run anybody out of town." They described some miscommunication and indicated staff and the commission will work to clarify the program and address outstanding issues through normal channels.
What happened next Council asked staff to take the public feedback into account and to coordinate with the Public Arts Commission and other stakeholders. No formal action to remove or retire specific works was recorded in the meeting transcript; councilors emphasized outreach and clarification of the loan program and application/criteria information already posted on the city's website.
Why this matters Residents described the sculptures as a tourist draw that supports local businesses and contributes to the city's distinct downtown character. Commission members said the loan program historically placed public art at minimal cost to the city; several speakers urged better communication about how the loan program works rather than removing artwork.
