Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Transportation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners weigh road engineering, chip‑seal vs. overlays and approve county software finish work
Summary
Board discussed engineering estimates for Colorado Road (engineering ~$47,000; total estimate presented ~$238,406.01) and Bridal/Homewood work (engineering quoted ~$86,000; construction estimate ~$170,000 without asphalt), directed staff to pursue engineering with Cook Flat for at least one project, and approved a roughly $11,000 change order to complete the public‑access parcel search as part of the county software project (staff said the project remains under budget).
Get email alerts on the Transportation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners spent significant time on infrastructure and technology at the Dec. 11 meeting, discussing road engineering estimates and the final phases of a countywide software implementation.
Public works staff presented two projects discussed at a recent study session: shouldering and erosion work on Colorado Road south of Pomona, where staff quoted an engineering estimate of about $47,000 and construction estimates that produced a grand total presented in the meeting as $238,406.01; and a 1.5‑mile Bridal/Homewood tie‑in near the I‑35 interchange where engineering fees were quoted around $86,000 and construction estimates (without asphalt) were presented as roughly $170,000. Staff cautioned that some components may require concrete in constrained areas, which could raise costs.
The board discussed options for using engineering firm Cook Flat to prepare plans for one or more projects so that the county would have engineered plans ready to support grant applications. Commissioners and staff debated whether to continue quadrant‑based maintenance (chip seal rotation) or shift funds toward higher‑quality asphalt overlays on prioritized stretches; staff said the county’s asset‑management program can be adapted for different prioritization strategies.
Separately, staff updated the board on the countywide software (ERP/public access) project. A proposed change order to finish the public access parcel search page came in at an estimated 93 hours and roughly $11,000, higher than an initial 40‑hour/$4,600 projection. Project managers said the overall implementation remains under budget with about $51,000 remaining in the allocated funds and recommended executing the change order; commissioners indicated that spending is within the previously approved project budget and did not require a separate board vote.
Staff said they will return with engagement letters or contracts from the engineer and with next steps for prioritizing roads if grant pursuit continues.

