Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the County Finance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission hears district court budget pressure; approves consent agenda with expenditures
Summary
At the Dec. 2 meeting the commission heard that the district court may seek general fund support because of rising interpreter and equipment costs, and the commission approved the consent agenda covering minutes and listed expenditures.
Get email alerts on the County Finance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Dickinson County commissioners on Dec. 2 heard that the district court is seeing increased costs and may ask the county for support, and they approved the regular consent agenda including meeting minutes and listed expenditures.
Presiding official (S1) reported that "Cindy McDonald in from district court, gave a report on the financial condition," and said the court was "looking at all spending a little more on interpreters and some equipment" and "could be asking for money out of general fund to support their budget." The transcript records that as the summary of the court's work session report; no formal funding request was recorded in the meeting minutes excerpt.
The commission approved the consent agenda by voice vote. The consent items listed in the transcript include the minutes of the Nov. 20 meeting and multiple expenditures and abatements; the transcript gives several numeric figures but portions of those figures are garbled in transcription (see clarifying details). Speaker 2 (S2) moved to approve the consent agenda and the motion carried on a voice vote.
In communications, the presiding official (S1) reported receipt of correspondence including a letter from Brad Dunlap (described in the transcript as "the owner of John Service") about a records service contract, and a notice that (as transcribed) "b ADS notified us Nov. 15" that a grant for a new front door and related repairs in the amount of $6,300 had been approved. The transcript does not identify the awarding agency by full name.
The commission did not take a formal vote on court support during the meeting; staff and commissioners discussed raising the issue in future budget conversations.

