Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Oklahoma Promise topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee backs ACT 22 requirement for Oklahoma Promise eligibility amid homeschool equity questions
Summary
The subcommittee recommended passage of House Bill 11 84, which would require a 22 ACT score for Oklahoma Promise scholarship eligibility. Sponsors said the rule ensures parity; critics urged collecting data on homeschool applicants and expressed concern about disparate impacts.
The appropriations budget subcommittee on education recommended passage of House Bill 11 84, which would require students to achieve a 22 on the ACT to qualify for the Oklahoma Promise scholarship, a state program intended to help Oklahomans attend college.
Representative West sponsored the measure and adopted a PCS. The sponsor described the requirement as a uniform standard for scholarship eligibility. Committee members pressed for data on how many homeschool students apply for the scholarship and how many would be excluded by a 22–ACT threshold; the sponsor acknowledged that number was not known to the committee during the hearing and resisted calls to delay the measure to gather data. Members also discussed whether traditional public-school students already face equivalent testing requirements. Fiscal staff discussion in the hearing produced no firm, compiled fiscal analysis; at an earlier point in the transcript a sponsor estimated a related fiscal impact at about $300,000 for a different item, but a formal fiscal estimate was not provided on the record for this specific change.
Why it matters: The bill would change eligibility criteria for a major statewide scholarship program and could affect students who do not take or who do not reach the ACT threshold, including some in the homeschool population. Members repeatedly urged that the committee collect data on how many homeschool applicants would be affected before imposing the requirement.
Committee action: The subcommittee recorded a recommendation to pass the bill by roll call (7 ayes, 2 nays). The transcript shows members asking multiple follow-up questions about the scope, justification and alternatives to a statutory test score requirement.
What’s next: The bill was recommended out of committee and will proceed to the next stage of legislative consideration. Sponsors were asked to provide clarifying data about affected applicants and fiscal implications.
