Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Floodplain Regulation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
County and city officials warn FEMA’s fast‑moving floodplain rules could limit development and impose new local duties
Summary
County Commissioner Casey Garrett and Columbia Economic Team staff told the committee FEMA has issued pre‑implementation requirements that counties must respond to by Dec. 1; speakers warned the rules could expand buffers, affect mitigation and insurance, and force local governments to implement and enforce new standards before the EIS and full public process are complete.
County Commissioner Casey Garrett and Columbia Economic Team representative Paul Vogel briefed the committee on rapidly changing FEMA guidance and a related pre‑implementation compliance measure (PICM). Garrett said his understanding is that "this will affect all floodplains" and that counties are preparing for widespread impacts on development and maintenance in floodplain areas.
Paul Vogel and others described an August letter and fast timeline: FEMA announced changes and suggested it would stop letters of map revision, constraining the ability of property owners and local governments to update maps. Vogel said those changes "locked everything down" and that FEMA is asking jurisdictions to indicate a compliance direction by Dec. 1; staff noted formal adoption on the books could be delayed until June 2025 but that local governments will be under significant short‑term pressure.
City planning staff explained the options available under the PICM: (1) do not allow floodplain development; (2) indicate intent to adopt FEMA's model code (with outreach and local hearings ahead of formal adoption); or (3) allow development but require an environmental assessment and mitigation for each floodplain permit. The planner emphasized that the model code provisions apply only to parts of a property that lie inside the FEMA 100‑year floodplain.
Speakers raised concerns about enforcement and capacity: Vogel and others warned local governments "are not tooled up" or staffed to manage mandatory enforcement and that withholding or changing flood insurance could have immediate market impacts even if legal challenges follow. Committee members asked for follow‑up briefings and for counsel to review implications for local projects and permits.
