Bluffdale council tables resolution to remove John C. Roberts’ name from Fire Station 92 until September hearing

Bluffdale City Council on a regularly scheduled meeting voted to table Resolution 2024-58, which would remove the name of John C. Roberts from Fire Station 92, and set the item for the first council meeting in September with the district attorney and Todd Sheeran asked to present.

Public commenters urged the council to delay action and hear from more residents. Becky Munger, who said she has lived in Bluffdale for 16 years, told the council: "Taking John's name off the fire station just feels petty and punitive … Please at least hear from people. Hear their stories." Connie Robbins said John Roberts provided "47 years of dedicated service" and noted he paid a $10,000 fine and that she expects his records to be expunged, arguing "there is absolutely no reason for the city to list his unfortunate charges in a permanent public resolution." These speakers were part of a larger set of comments urging postponement and fuller public input.

Council members debated whether a city building should bear the name of someone who "has admitted to a felony against the city," a point raised by Council member Crockett during discussion. Other council members and the mayor noted Roberts’ lengthy service and the community division the measure has produced. One council member said the matter had previously been referred to the District Attorney's office after staff investigations uncovered allegations including pay discrepancies and other operational concerns.

Council member Austin moved to table the item "until we can get more information and we have a full council." The motion was amended to specify tabling to the first meeting in September with the District Attorney and Todd Sheeran asked to present. After procedural clarification and roll call, the motion to table passed; the transcript records Council member Austin voting "Yes," Council member Wilding voting "Yes," and Council member Crockett voting "No." The mayor and staff said they would attempt to secure the requested presenters and noted a special meeting might be required if those parties are unavailable.

The council did not take final action on the naming resolution at this meeting. The council’s directive leaves open a public session in which the district attorney and others may present evidence and discussion will continue before any final vote.