Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Downtown Design topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council delays downtown design guidelines after extended debate over enforcement and review committee
Summary
Council members asked staff to clarify enforcement language and the composition and appeal process for a proposed downtown design review committee before bringing updated downtown design guidelines back for adoption. The discussion focused on whether guidelines should use mandatory language and how code enforcement would be applied.
Get email alerts on the Downtown Design topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council and staff spent significant time debating proposed updates to the Chowchilla Downtown Design Guidelines, including reinstating a preferred color palette for the downtown core and creating a downtown design review committee to review proposed exterior changes.
Planning staff described the update as a reinstatement of a color guide intended to encourage neutral, complementary materials in the downtown core and outlined a new review committee that would approve changes to storefronts and building exteriors. The staff presentation and subsequent exchange noted that the guidelines had previously been changed in 2017 to remove a restrictive color palette and that the new proposal would provide guidance while seeking an enforceable review process.
Council members and code-enforcement representatives repeatedly questioned whether the guidelines should say that owners 'shall' comply rather than that they 'should' comply, and whether a committee or the Planning Commission should perform reviews. Legal and staff counsel described challenges enforcing strict color mandates and recommended a review committee structure to provide an approval path; staff cited the example used by Fresno where council members appoint district representatives to a design review committee.
Key council concerns included: - Who serves on the review committee and how members are selected. - Whether the review committee's decisions would be appealable and what the appeal path should be. - How code enforcement would cite violations and whether the guideline language provides adequate enforcement authority.
Rather than adopt the updates, the council directed staff to return with clarified committee language (composition, process and enforcement references) so that the guidelines can be made enforceable while preserving flexibility for applicants. That item will return to a future meeting with the requested details.
The debate highlighted tension between giving the city flexibility to encourage a consistent downtown look and creating a clear, enforceable process for exterior changes. Council agreed staff should work with legal and the police chief on enforceability language and bring back the item with the committee composition and procedural clarifications.
