Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Memorial Programs topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Commission outlines commemorative-brick plan for park path; engineering review, installation timing discussed

Parks Commission · November 20, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Commissioners reviewed a proposed commemorative-brick program for a park path in Depoe Bay, debating brick sizes, path width, installation timing and a request to seek reduced route-pass charges from the city engineer after a contractor missed the deadline.

The Parks Commission discussed a community commemorative-brick program and path installation that would allow residents to buy engraved bricks placed in a designated park path. Commissioners reviewed options for brick size and path width, raised durability and replacement concerns, and asked the city engineer to pursue reduced or waived route-pass charges after a contractor missed the project's deadline.

Why it matters: The brick program is intended as both a fundraising tool and a long-term memorial feature in a public park. Decisions about installation method, materials and maintenance responsibility will affect future maintenance costs and donor expectations.

Details from the discussion - Path design and brick size: Commissioners discussed multiple width options (4–8 feet) and noted commonly used brick sizes (4-by-6 options were mentioned). Unidentified Speaker 5 said there had been quotes for 6- and 8-foot designs and commissioners signaled a preference to confirm engineering constraints before finalizing size. - Installation and durability: Commissioners raised concerns about long-term wear, freeze–thaw damage and replacement responsibility. One commissioner said, based on contractor input, newer polymer fills extend longevity and reduce cracking in colder, wet areas. - Funding and sales: Pricing models and staged installations were discussed so donors would not wait long periods for placement. Commissioners proposed phased placement (install when a set number is reached) to avoid long waits for donors. - Route-pass fee: After a contractor missed a deadline, Unidentified Speaker 2 asked the city engineer to seek a reduced or waived route-pass because of the delay: "John, I want the route pass either greatly reduced or free." Commissioners asked staff to follow up and confirm whether funds collected from bricks would be held in a maintenance "kitty" for future repairs.

Next steps: The commission will consult the city engineer to finalize path width, confirm installation details and present a refined plan and timeline — including a projected sales and installation schedule — to the council in January.