Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Discipline Investigations topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Louisiana board opens multiple formal investigations and uses summary suspensions in several cases
Summary
The board voted to initiate multiple formal investigations and, in several matters, to impose summary suspensions or other interim actions; votes varied by case with some close tallies and recusals recorded.
At its Dec. 16 meeting, the Louisiana State Board of Medical Examiners moved to initiate a series of formal investigations and, in multiple items, to impose summary suspensions or other interim measures.
Agenda items in the 7.4 series covered more than a dozen separate cases. For several items the board voted unanimously or by clear majorities to open formal investigations (the transcript records roll-call results described as unanimous or passing for items including 7.4.02, 7.4.03 and several others). In other items the board divided on motions to impose summary suspensions: some motions passed (recorded tallies such as 5—— are reported), others failed or resulted in ties requiring additional motions.
The board recorded recusals where appropriate. In at least one matter a board member stated a formal summary suspension was being proposed because of an associated criminal offense; members requested legal counsel's advice and planned to return to executive session for legal discussion.
Chair and staff repeatedly noted that formal-investigation votes and summary-suspension votes were distinct actions and that the board would divide questions as necessary. Several board members asked for precise roll-call tallies to ensure a majority of members present voted on the matters.
The meeting record reflects that the board opened many of the investigations listed on the agenda (7.4.01 through items in the 7.4.x series) and moved consent orders and other investigatory outcomes forward for case-processing, including requests to extend preliminary reviews and to initiate probation or other monitoring when applicable.
Because individual case details are sensitive and often involved sealed or executive-session material, the board handled specific legal-process questions in executive session and limited public discussion to procedural outcomes and recorded votes.
Board staff said legal advice would follow in executive session regarding implementation and next steps for prosecutions or administrative actions resulting from the investigations.
