Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Victim Impact Parole topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Victim testimony shapes parole denial for Daniel Steiner in Louisiana rehearing
Summary
At a rehearing for Daniel Steiner, victim-family testimony and prosecutor opposition led the Louisiana parole panel to deny release. Family members described long-term trauma from the 2000 killing and urged the board to keep Steiner confined.
Get email alerts on the Victim Impact Parole topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Daniel Steiner appeared before the Louisiana Committee on Parole for a rehearing in which he acknowledged remorse and described steps taken while incarcerated. Several supporters and prison staff credited Steiner with rehabilitative programming, including victim-impact classes and disciplinary improvements.
Family members of the victim delivered extended, emotional testimony describing the attack’s long-term impact. Philip Jean Louis Jr., the victim’s son, told the panel that he still relives the events of Feb. 2, 2000, and that the family remains deeply harmed by the loss: "I still have to relive and think about 02/02/2000 and what happened on that day," he said. The family’s statements, along with written records and a description of the attack, were raised repeatedly during the hearing.
Rhea Bastani, an assistant district attorney appearing on behalf of the 15th JDC, told the board she opposed parole and reminded members the case had been charged as second-degree murder before a plea. She urged the panel to consider the violent nature of the offense and community safety in their decision.
Panel members acknowledged the applicant’s rehabilitative steps but cited the seriousness of the underlying conduct, the prosecutorial and victim-family opposition, and prior criminal history when explaining their votes. One member told the applicant the victim’s statement was "powerful and impactful," and the panel ultimately denied Steiner’s rehearing request.
The board encouraged Steiner to continue programming and to reapply at an appropriate future date; members said denial was based on the record presented at this hearing and the balance between rehabilitation and public-safety risk.

