Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Medicaid topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
LCAR approves Agency of Human Services HPEE changes; one lawmaker records a dissent on Part 3
Summary
LCAR approved revisions to the Health Benefits Eligibility and Enrollment rule (HPEE), codifying several COVID‑era federal flexibilities and clarifying eligibility for certain populations; Part 3 passed with one recorded no vote by Representative David Weeks.
Robin Chapman, staff attorney with the Department of Vermont Health Access, and Danny Fiacco, senior policy and implementation analyst, presented revisions to the Health Benefits Eligibility and Enrollment (HPEE) rule (24P31/24P32/24P33) that the agency said largely codify federal changes and temporary COVID‑era flexibilities and formalize long‑standing administrative practices.
Chapman told the committee the package began in July (pre‑filed July 26), was reviewed by I CAR on Aug. 12, filed with the Secretary of State on Aug. 30, and that a public hearing on Oct. 4 drew no attendees; the public comment period closed Oct. 11 with no comments on this filing. The final proposed rule was filed Nov. 5.
Key changes discussed include codifying a streamlined transitional medical assistance program, affirming that dividend and interest from resources are not counted for Medicare savings programs (a practice the department said it has followed for years), and updating eligibility to reflect a federal change that allows people with DACA status to enroll in qualified health plans and receive subsidies — but not to enroll in Medicaid. Chapman summarized the package as partly implementing federal mandates and partly formalizing practices adopted during the COVID‑era unwind.
Danny Fiacco explained the federal context: the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) has repealed the prior requirement that applicants must pursue all sources of income, and CMS removed mandatory interviews as an eligibility precondition. Fiacco said some elements were federal mandates and others were departmental choices made for administrative efficiency; he also said the department did not identify a fiscal impact for the current package.
Committee members asked whether the changes were budget neutral relative to pre‑COVID baselines or only neutral relative to practices adopted during the COVID response. The department offered to follow up on that comparison. Members also asked for clarity about technical revisions, and Jennifer Carby (Office of Legislative Council) said she had reviewed the materials and found the changes largely conforming and did not require further alteration.
Senator Breyer moved approval of Part 2 (24P31), which passed by voice vote. The committee then voted on Part 3 (24P32); the motion passed with one recorded nay by Representative David Weeks. Part 7 (24P33) was subsequently approved by voice vote.
The transcript records voice votes for approvals and one explicit recorded no vote; no detailed roll‑call tallies appear in the public transcript. Department staff asked that the rule be effective Jan. 1 and said they would provide follow‑up on budget questions.
