Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Comprehensive Plan topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Shawnee Planning Commission backs comprehensive plan amendments, opts for flexible mixed‑residential definition

Shawnee Planning Commission · December 16, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

After public comment and extended debate, the Shawnee Planning Commission voted Dec. 16 to recommend amendments to the Achieve Shawnee comprehensive plan and to adopt Option B for the mixed‑residential definition, sending the package and a resolution to the city council for further review; one commissioner recorded a dissent.

The Shawnee Planning Commission voted Dec. 16 to recommend proposed amendments to the city’s Achieve Shawnee Comprehensive Plan and to adopt the Option B definition for the plan’s mixed‑residential category.

Staff opened a public hearing and presented a package of updates to the future land‑use framework and transportation framework, including a new development framework table, a proposed Valley of Champions recreation district, and about 10 recommended roadway adjustments. Staff said these amendments provide clearer guidance for future development and that the amendments would be considered by the city council committee in January and by the full council, tentatively, in February.

A central debate during the hearing focused on two alternative definitions for the mixed‑residential future‑land‑use category. Option A would discourage multi‑story and multifamily development in these areas; Option B allows garden‑style or similar apartments as part of a broader mix of housing types but says apartments "should be located near or along a major transportation corridor" and should not be the predominant housing type. Doug (planning staff) emphasized the community feedback map (red areas labeled "growth inappropriate" and candy‑striped areas labeled "mixed response") came from a resident exercise and is intended as a sensitivity flag to prompt extra scrutiny and outreach, not an absolute prohibition on development.

During public comment, resident Ryan Edinger said he supports more downtown development and housing options, including apartments to broaden tax base and affordability, and asked the city to improve pedestrian links near Bluejacket Flint elementary school. Commissioners debated tradeoffs: supporters of Option B said the language provides useful, contextual guidance and preserves flexibility for creative housing types; supporters of Option A urged caution, warning that labeling an area as allowing "apartments" can create a tunnel‑vision effect for developers and provoke neighborhood pushback.

Commissioner Kathy Peterson moved to approve the staff‑recommended comprehensive plan amendments incorporating Option B for the mixed‑residential definition; Commissioner Fox seconded. The motion carried with one recorded no by Commissioner Shavannah Walling. Staff will forward the resolution and the amended plan text to the city council committee for review, with a tentative committee review in January and final council consideration expected in February. The plan package remains guidance; any rezoning or special permits would proceed through separate public processes.

The amendments discussed include clarifying the growth‑sensitivity legend on the future‑land‑use map, adding a development framework table to provide guidance on building form and transitions, and folding a transportation alternatives map (bicycle routes and shared‑use paths) into the transportation framework.