Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Vosha Heat topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
VOSHA Cites Heat Risks at Springfield Unit; DOC Promises Interim Mitigations, Long‑Term HVAC Work
Summary
At a Sept. 18 oversight hearing, committee members reviewed a VOSHA corrective action letter that recorded interior cellblock temperatures in the mid‑80s to low‑90s; DOC described short‑term mitigations and said HVAC capital projects are funded but will take years to complete.
Get email alerts on the Vosha Heat topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Joint Legislative Justice Oversight Committee on Sept. 18 examined a VOSHA corrective action arising from heat‑related incidents at DOC facilities, including temperature measurements taken in June that reached the low‑90s in some housing units.
VOSHA’s onsite measurements supplied to the committee showed unit readings such as: Infirmary 86°F, Fox 90°F, Delta 93°F, and Charlie 91°F during a late‑June assessment, and prompted VOSHA to require DOC either to implement a Heat Injury and Illness Prevention Program or document an alternative approach with a written outline.
DOC officials told the committee they submitted the required initial response within the 30‑day window. “That was done,” said a facilities director when the committee asked whether DOC had provided the required notice to VOSHA. The department outlined interim measures including cooling stations (a slushy machine was installed at Southern State), distribution of cooling towels, changes to staff uniforms to lighter materials, increased water availability, and a short training module for supervisors and staff on heat illness prevention.
Longer‑term fixes will require capital work: the department and the chair described near‑term funding to begin HVAC work at Springfield and identified more extensive roof and retrofit work at other sites that will take additional appropriation and time. The committee heard that one roofing/replacement phase for a later facility would be a multimillion‑dollar project and that full HVAC rollout across older concrete facilities will require multi‑year budgeting and construction, with the Springfield project not expected to be operational for several years.
Why it matters: heat exposures at the recorded levels create risk to staff and incarcerated people, particularly in units without effective ventilation or cooling. DOC described the corrective action plan as a top priority and said it will standardize the heat illness prevention training and verify site‑level mitigations each summer while capital projects proceed.
Committee follow‑up requests: legislators asked DOC to document the corrective actions, provide the VOSHA program outline within VOSHA’s timeline, and return with evidence of reduced workplace heat risk and metrics showing how temporary mitigations changed incident patterns. The committee postponed other scheduled items to allow follow‑up on VOSHA compliance and the heat prevention plan.

