Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Budget topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board members push for earlier budget review after cyber‑charter cost spike
Summary
Board members urged more direct participation in budget development after business manager reported a sharp rise in Cyber Charter invoices tied to more timely billing and higher special‑education enrollment. Members questioned the board's role and requested monthly finance‑committee work beginning in January.
Board members at the Southmoreland School District meeting on Nov. 19 pressed for greater board involvement in preparing the upcoming $36 million budget after the business manager presented an analysis showing a recent spike in Cyber Charter invoices.
Pam, the district business manager, told the board she had completed work on the district’s Annual Financial Report and traced the invoice spike to two causes: more timely submission and processing of invoices and an increase in special‑education students attending cyber charter schools. She said that compared with last year many invoices that had previously been paid through September were now being received and paid earlier, and that enrollment changes had driven higher Special Education costs.
Board member Dr. Fike said the full board historically participated in developing the budget and urged a return to regular Board‑of‑the‑Whole budget meetings so members could review line‑by‑line categories rather than seeing only a near‑final proposal. “We’re talking $36,000,000,” he said, arguing that amount merited earlier and fuller review.
Administrators and the district solicitor responded that the finance‑committee structure is intended to provide that review: the finance committee meets monthly during budget season, and materials presented there are summarized at the next regular board meeting so all members receive the information. The solicitor noted that committee discussions must remain public unless personnel matters justify an executive session.
Board members pressed for clearer committee reporting and for the schedule of finance‑committee meetings to be visible; the board agreed that finance meetings will resume in January and occur monthly leading up to budget adoption. The business manager said she would continue analysing cyber‑charter costs and provide more detail to the board.
The discussion closed with routine approvals of the General Fund summary and check listings; members had follow‑up questions about account codes and specific line items.
