Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Right Of Way Vacation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
After hours of public testimony, Clay County commissioners vote to vacate portion of Melrose Road
Summary
Following extensive, split public comment on safety, access and historic use, Clay County commissioners voted 5‑0 to vacate a 1.1‑mile portion of Melrose Road; the county engineer warned of safety and liability concerns if the roadway remained open.
Clay County commissioners voted unanimously June 11 to approve a petition to vacate a portion of Melrose Road in the southwestern corner of the county after a lengthy public hearing that drew divided testimony from residents, property owners and county staff.
County engineering staff said the contested stretch is narrow, poorly maintained and has become a safety concern because non‑resident drivers use it as a cut‑through at high speeds. Richard Smith, Clay County engineering, told the board the road is difficult to maintain, has limited sight distance and that the county has concerns about emergency‑vehicle access and potential liability for the engineer’s office.
More than a dozen residents spoke. Several who live on or near Melrose Road urged closure, citing high speeds, dumping, trespass, repeated damage to gates and a fatal crash years earlier. Multiple speakers described instances of heavy vehicles and dumpings that they said made the road dangerous for residents and children. Other residents, including those who rely on the route for shorter commutes (some saying it saves roughly 3.2 miles each trip), opposed closure and warned that the decision would add travel time and complicate emergency response for some households.
Commissioners debated options including barricades, emergency turnarounds and owner commitment to erect physical barriers. The petitioner (a property owner who owns both sides of the road) agreed to dedicate land for an emergency turnaround and to work with the county on barricading the vacated portion. Engineering said the county would improve the public portion it retains (millings and paving program cited) and would not expend funds on the private portion beyond established obligations.
After discussion, a motion to approve the vacation passed 5‑0. County staff recorded that they will coordinate placement of temporary type‑3 barricades and require the property owner to implement a longer‑term physical barrier on the vacated portion. The engineer also committed to verify existing trees and right‑of‑way elements that might need removal to support safe emergency access for the portion the county retains.
The board’s action removes that segment from the county’s maintained right‑of‑way and transfers responsibility for the private portion to the adjacent owner; staff and the petitioner will work out details for barricades and an emergency turnaround.
