Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Solid Waste topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Clay County approves new curbside collection rate, holds disposal assessment steady amid heated debate

Board of County Commissioners (Clay County) · August 27, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The board kept the annual disposal assessment at $96 and approved a new collection rate to fund a countywide contract with FCC beginning Oct. 1. Commissioners and residents sparred over cost, billing frequency and impacts on fixed-income and rural households; the collection rate passed 3–2.

Clay County commissioners voted on Aug. 27 to maintain the county’s annual disposal assessment at $96 per household and to adopt the collection rate needed to fund a new countywide curbside-collection contract scheduled to begin Oct. 1.

At a public hearing, staff explained the two-part assessment: the $96 assessment covers disposal (the landfill or tipping-cost portion) and the separate collection charge covers weekly curbside pickup under the new contract. "This is the disposal piece; this is not the collection at the curbside," the County Attorney told the board during the hearing to distinguish the two assessments.

Environmental Services operations manager Jamie Wilkes described the contract’s operational assumptions: the bid anticipated providing one 95-gallon automated can to every household and a single weekly pickup, with optional additional carts available. "The bid was to pick up a 95-gallon can at every household," Wilkes said. "If a household chooses a smaller can, that option exists, but the contract price was bid on a single 95-gallon container per dwelling per week." Wilkes also explained yard-waste changes proposed in a separate amendment.

Residents and commissioners raised affordability concerns. Several speakers and board members urged the county to consider tiered billing or alternatives for fixed-income households, arguing that a flat, countywide rate could disproportionately affect senior or mobile-home residents. The County Auditor and others emphasized the administrative timeline: the county must place assessment language on the tax roll by the statutory deadline to fund the contract, which limited options for mid-course changes before the Oct. 1 start date.

After debate and a failed attempt to delay or tier the assessment, the board approved the collection rate needed to fund the contract; the motion carried 3–2. The disposal assessment remained unchanged at $96.

Board members said they would ask staff to continue evaluating billing options, customer supports and an audit of the contractor’s transition plan. The County Auditor announced an internal audit of FCC’s transition plan and testing schedule that will produce progress reports to the board leading up to the contractor’s start date.

The board’s action preserves universal curbside collection under the contract; staff and the auditor will continue post-approval monitoring and reporting.